Kerangka Konseptual Integritas: Studi Eksplorasi pada Guru-guru Sekolah Dasar di Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.mps.2019.005.01.2Keywords:
integrity, indigenous approach, valuesAbstract
Integrity is commitment to positive values i.e. honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility and courage. To encourage children to commit to such positive values, elementary school educatorsare expected to understand the essential values of integrity. This study is an exploratory qualitative study attemptingto buildan understanding on the Indonesian school teacher’s concepts ofintegritywith an indigenous approach. An open ended survey was conducted to a sample of 121 elementary school teachers from Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta. A group of elementary school teachers from the sample was recruited to assist the data analysis process, to ensure a data coding in accordance to their conception. The categories were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The result of this research revealed the perspective of elementary school teachers on the importance of certain values involved in integrity, how they teach their students to embrace the values. Theoretical and applied implementation of this research results is discussed.
Integritas adalah komitmen terhadap nilai-nilai positif yaitu kejujuran, kepercayaan, keadilan, rasa hormat, tanggung jawab dan keberanian. Untuk mendorong siswa SD berkomitmen pada nilai-nilai positif seperti itu, pendidik sekolah dasar diharapkan memahami nilai-nilai penting dari integritas. Penelitian ini merupakan studi kualitatif eksploratif yang mencoba membangun pemahaman tentang konsep integritas guru sekolah Indonesia dengan pendekatan indijenous. Survei open-ended disebarkan dan diisi 121 guru sekolah dasar dari Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta. Kemudian sekelompok guru sekolah dasar dari partisipan tersebut direkrut untuk membantu proses analisis data, untuk memastikan pengkodean data sesuai dengan konsepsi mereka. Kategori dianalisis dengan statistik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan perspektif guru sekolah dasar tentang pentingnya nilai-nilai tertentu yang terlibat dalam integritas dan bagaimana mereka mengajar siswa mereka untuk mengadopsi nilai-nilai luhur. Penerapan teoritis dan praktis dari hasil penelitian ini akan dibahas.
Downloads
References
Ashford, E. (2000). Utilitarianism, integrity and partiality. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(8), 421-439. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil200097834
Barnard, A., Schurink, W., & De Beer, M. (2008). A conceptual framework of integrity: empirical research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34(2), 40-49. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC89154
Barret, C. (2003). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches: lessons from the pastoral risk management project. Dalam S. R. Kanbur (Ed.), Q-Squared: combining qualitative and quantitative methods of poverty appraisal (hal. 90-96). Hyberabad: Orient Blackswan.
Becker, T. E. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154-161. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259104
Becker, T. E. (2005). Development and validation of a situational judgment test of employee integrity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 225-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00319.x
Bigelow, J., & Pargetter, R. (2007). Integrity and autonomy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 44(1), 39-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20464353
Calhoun, C. (1995). Standing for something. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(5), 235-260. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2940917
Cameron, K. S. (2003). Organisational virtuousness and performance. Dalam J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organisational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (hal. 48-65). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. E. (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Craig, S. B., & Gustafson, S. B. (1998). Perceived leader integrity scale: An instrument for assessing employee perceptions of integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(2), 127–145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90001-7
Cox, D., La Caze, M., & Levine, M. (2013). Integrity. Dalam E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=integrity
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
Halfon, M. (1989). Integrity: Philosophical Inquiry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. Dalam C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford.
Kiel, F., & Lennick, D. (2005). Moral Intelligence: Enhancing Business Performance and Leadership Success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Kaiser, R. B., & Hogan, R. (2010). How to (and how not to) assess the integrity of managers. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 216-234. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022265
McFall, L. (1987). Integrity. Ethics, 98(1), 5-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/292912
Schabracq, M. J. (2003). Everyday well-being and stress in work and organisations. Dalam M. J Schabracq, J. A. M. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Handbook of Work And Health Psychology (hal. 9-36). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Transparency International. (2018). Corruption Perception Index 2017. Diambil dari www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption _perceptions _index_2017
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human relations, 56(1), 5-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056001448
