Pentingnya Kolaborasi dalam Menciptakan Sistem Pendidikan yang Berkualitas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.mps.2019.005.01.4Keywords:
good teacher, good quality of education, collaboration, principal’s roleAbstract
A good education system is created when the school is led by a competent and creative principal, as well as those who are able to foster good relationships with teachers at the school. In addition, teachers with appropriate personalities and competencies will support the creation of a good learning environment and encourage their students to actively perform and make them personal. This study aims to provide clear information about the importance of collaboration among elements of educational support. The study used a mixed case study methodology, an open questionnaire, and a descriptive statistical analysis of 173 subjects consisting of two principals, 43 teachers, and 130 students. The results of case studies explain how the role of principals is crucial in shaping the character and performance of schools, especially with regard to their leadership style and creativity. While the analysis of open questionnaires categorizes that students expect to become dream teachers are those who are able to become partners, those who have the competence, and those who are experienced. The role of the principal, the presence of a qualified teacher, and the similarity of students' perceptions to their school will result in a collaboration that is mutually supportive of one another.
Sistem pendidikan yang baik tercipta ketika sekolah dipimpin oleh kepala sekolah yang kompeten dan kreatif, juga mereka yang mampu membina hubungan yang baik dengan guru-guru di sekolah tersebut. Selain itu guru-guru dengan kepribadian dan kompetensi yang sesuai akan mendukung terciptanya suasana belajar yang baik dan mendorong siswanya untuk aktif berprestasi dan menjadikan mereka pribadi yang baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan informasi yang jelas mengenai pentingnya kolaborasi di antara elemen-elemen penunjang pendidikan tersebut. Studi ini menggunakan metodologi campuran studi kasus, kuesioner terbuka, dan analisis statistik deskriptif terhadap 173 subjek yang terdiri dari dua orang kepala sekolah, 43 orang guru, dan 130 orang siswa. Hasil dari studi kasus menjelaskan tentang bagaimana peran kepala sekolah sangat penting dalam membentuk karakter dan performa sekolah, terutama berkaitan dengan gaya kepemimpinan dan kreativitas mereka. Sedangkan analisis terhadap kuesioner terbuka mengategorikan bahwa siswa mengharapkan untuk menjadi guru idaman adalah mereka yang mampu menjadi partner, mereka yang memunyai kompetensi, dan mereka yang berpengalaman. Peran kepala sekolah, keberadaan seorang guru yang mumpuni, dan kesamaan persepsi siswa dengan sekolah mereka akan menghasilkan satu kolaborasi yang saling mendukung satu dengan yang lainnya.
Downloads
References
Berg, R. van den. (2002). Teachers’ meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 557-625. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072004577
Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X82018003004
Brodaty, T., & Gurgand, M. (2016). Good peers or good teachers? Evidence from a French university. Economic of Education Review, 54, 62–78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.06.005
Departemen Agama RI. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (hal. 1). Jakarta: Departemen Agama RI.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258557
Hallinger, P. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578239210014306
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002
Harden, R. M., & Crosby, J. (2009). AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer -the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 334–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/014215900409429
Hosgorur, T. (2012). A discussion of what makes a good teacher: Opinions of pre-service primary school teacher. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 451–460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.524
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Toward a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1982). The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 309–339. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052003309
Murphy, P. K., Delli, L. A. M., & Edwards, M. N. (2010). The good teacher and good teaching: Comparing beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 69-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.72.2.69-92
Porter, M. E., Stren, S., & Loria, R. A. (2013). Social Progress Index 2013. Washington, DC: Social Progress Imperative.
Ramdani, Z. (2017). Forgiving is not only forgetting (phenomenological study on forgiveness in individu who experiences a friendship conflict. IJASOS- International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 3(9), 829–839. doi: https://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.366853
Ramdani, Z., & Fahmi, I. (2016). Profil kekuatan karakter dan kebajikan pada mahasiswa berprestasi. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 1(1), 98–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v1i1.471
Raufelder, D., Nitsche, L., Breitmeyer, S., Kebler, S., Herrmann, E., & Regner, N. (2016). Student’s perception of “good†and “bad†teacher: Results of qualitative thematic analysis with German adolesencents. International Journal of Education Research, 75, 31–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.11.004
Riehl, C. J. (2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070001055
Rooij, E. C. M., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2018). “Our job is to deliver a good secondary school student, not a good university student.†Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding university preparation. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 9–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.005
Sahlberg P. (2010) Educational Change in Finland. Pada A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, D. Hopkins (eds), Second International Handbook of Educational Change. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 23. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_19
Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
Scheerens, J., & Blomeke, S. (2016). Integrating teacher education effectiveness research into educational effectiveness model. Educational Research Review, 18, 70–87. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.002
Schwab, K. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report. Cologny: World Economic Forum.
