Article Tools
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)
About The Authors

Primagitta Hermawati
Universitas Brawijaya
Indonesia

Department of Psychology

Ika Rahma Susilawati
Universitas Brawijaya
Indonesia

Department of Psychology

Selly Dian Widyasari
Universitas Brawijaya
Indonesia

Department of Psychology

User
Information for Reviewer
Journal Index
Visitor Statistic
Journal Content

Browse
Notifications

Bias Wawancara: Perbedaan Teknik Wawancara (Situational dan Behavioral) dalam Hal Penilaian Wawancara Kerja

Primagitta Hermawati, Ika Rahma Susilawati, Selly Dian Widyasari
  Mediapsi, Vol 3, No 1 (2017),  17-25  

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil penilaian wawancara kerja antara kandidat yang diwawancarai dengan teknik situational dengan behavioral. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain between subject yang mana terdapat dua kelompok dan mendapatkan perlakuan yang berbeda. Penelitian ini dilakukan kepada 110 partisipan mahasiswa psikologi Universitas Brawijaya yang telah lulus mata kuliah Psikodiagnostik III (Wawancara). Partisipan dalam eksperimen ini mendapat dua perlakuan, yaitu diberi tontonan video wawancara dengan kandidat yang diwawancarai menggunakan teknik wawancara situational dan video wawancara dengan kandidat yang diwawancarai menggunakan teknik wawancara behavioral. Setelah menonton video, partisipan diminta untuk memberi penilaian terhadap kandidat tersebut. Hasil analisis statistik menggunakan teknik independent sample t-test menunjukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara hasil penilaian wawancara kandidat yang diwawancarai dengan teknik wawancara situational dan behavioral, di mana kandidat yang diwawancara dengan teknik situational memperoleh penilaian lebih rendah secara signifikan daripada kandidat yang diwawancarai dengan teknik behavioral (F=0.001, P<0.05).


Keywords


bias wawancara; penilaian wawancara; teknik wawancara

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alarcon, M. G., Lyons, B. J., & Christensen, C. J. (2016). The effect of propensity to trust and familiarity on perceptions of trustworthiness over time. Personality Indivudual Differences, 94, 309-315.

Arvey, R. D., & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: a summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35.

Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & Degrassi, S. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1394-1411.

Bendick, M. J., & Nunes, A. P. (2012). Developing the research basis for controlling bias in hiring. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 238-262.

Campion, M. A., Campion, J. E., & Palmer, D. K. (1997). A review structure in the selection interview. Personel Psychology, 50, 655-702

Eder, R., & Haris, D. (2006). Managing Quality. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.

Handoko, T. (2008). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE: Yogyakarta

Hasibuan, M. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Huffcut, A. I., Weekley, J. A., Wiesner, W. H., & Degroot, T. G. (2001). Comparison of situational and behavior description interview question for higher-level positions. Personnel Psychology, 54(3), 619–644.

Hufcutt, A. I., & Culbertson, T. A. (2010). The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: a field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 622-632.

Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., Conway, J. M., & Klehe, U. C. (2004). The impact of job complexity and study design on situational and behavior description interview validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(3), 262-273.

Klehe, U. C., & Latham, G. (2006). What would you do-really or ideally? Contructs underlying the behavior description interview and the situational interview in predicting typical versus maximum performnace. Human performance, 19(4), 357-382.

Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, P. (1990). Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A (2013). The stuctured employment interview: narrative and quantitative review of the research literature: Personel Psychology, 67(1), 241-293.

Macan, T. (2009). The employment interview: a review of current studies and directions for future research. Human Resources Management Review, 19(3), 203-218.

MacGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Spears, R. (2002). Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs about Social Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mangkuprawira, S. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Myers, A., & Hansen, C. H. (2006). Experimental Psychology 6th Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadworth Inc.

Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117-124.

Wirawan. (2012). Evaluasi Kinerja sumber Daya Manusia: Teori Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.mps.2017.003.01.3

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.